.
2010/17: The Travis Tuck case: is the AFL's policy on illicit-drug use adequate?
Introduction to the media issue
Video clip at right:
TOP: an ABC Stateline segment from September 2010, outlining the controversy around Travis Tuck in particular and the AFL's drugs policy in general.
If you cannot see this clip, it will be because video is blocked by your network. To view the clip, access from home or from a public library, or from another network which allows viewing of video clips.
What they said...
'The fact remains he [Tuck] has now effectively tested positive three times and been banned for only 12 weeks'
Luke Buttigieg writing for sportal.com.au
'Our whole Illicit Drug policy is about helping players - to offer support, counselling and treatment to address issues around illicit drug use'
League operations manager, Adrian Anderson
The issue at a glance
On September 1, 2010, it was announced that Hawthorn midfielder, Travis Tuck, was to be banned for 12 weeks from playing within the AFL competition after confessing to the use of the illegal substance GHB.
Travis Tuck is the first player to appear before an AFL Tribunal for a third offence against the League's illicit-drugs code. Tuck was fined $5000 for the first offence, banned for six games for the second, and suspended for another six games for the third. However, because of 'extenuating and compelling circumstances', Tuck, who is being treated for clinical depression, will not have to pay the fine and will be able to return to the VFL after missing eight games.
The case has provoked significant controversy. Tuck's appearance has led to claims that the illicit-drugs code is not working, that it is too lenient, too harsh and most particularly, that it ignores the rights of the clubs and their capacity to assist their players.
|
