Right: Many dogs apart from the American pit bull terrier cannot legally be imported. All are considered "dangerous" dogs, including the Japanes tosa.
 Found a word you're not familiar with? Double-click that word to bring up a dictionary reference to it. The dictionary page includes an audio sound file with which to actually hear the word said. |
Background information
(The following information has been taken from the Wikipedia entry 'Breed-specific legislation'. The full entry can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breed-specific_legislation )
Restricted Dogs in Australia
The importation of the Dogo Argentino, Fila Brasileiro, Japanese tosa, American pit bull terrier or pit bull terrier, and Perro de Presa Canario or Presa Canario into Australia is absolutely prohibited.
New South Wales
January 13, 2006
The following dogs are restricted dogs: American pit bull terrier or pit bull terrier. Japanese tosa, dogo Argentino, fila Brasileiro, any other dog of a breed, kind or description whose importation into Australia is prohibited by or under the Customs Act 1901 of the Commonwealth; any dog declared by an authorised officer of a council to be a restricted dog; any other dog of a breed, kind or description prescribed by the regulations for the purposes of this section.
Restricted dogs may not be sold, given away, or acquired, and must be spay/neutered. They must be muzzled when in public, wear a special red-and-yellow collar, and may only be handled by a competent adult over the age of 18.
The dog must live in a secure enclosure when at home, and the owner must post "Warning: Dangerous Dog" signs on their property. The owner must also register the dog with the local government and notify the government if the dog attacks a person or animal, cannot be found, dies, has moved out of the area, or is now living at a different location within the local government's jurisdiction.
Queensland
July 1, 2009
A dog of a breed prohibited from importation into Australia under the Australian Customs Act of 1901 is considered "restricted." Breeds currently prohibited under Commonwealth legislation are the dogo Argentino; fila Brasiliero; Japanese tosa; American pit bull terrier (or pit bull terrier); and Perro de Presa Canario (or Presa Canario).
A person who owns a "restricted" dog must:
keep the dog within a child-proof enclosure; display warning signs at the entrance to the property where the dog is located; muzzle the dog in public and have it under effective control at all times; ensure the dog is spay/neutered, wearing a collar and a prescribed tag, and is microchipped.
South Australia
July 1, 2004
The dogo Argentino; fila Brasiliero; Japanese tosa; American pit bull terrier (or pit bull terrier); and Perro de Presa Canario (or Presa Canario) are considered "prescribed breeds."
Owners of prescribed breeds:
Must muzzle their dogs and ensure they are under effective control by means of physical restraint; must spay/neuter their dogs; may not sell or give away their dog, or advertise to sell or give away their dog.
Victoria
November 2, 2005
"Restricted breed" dogs are defined as those dogs prohibited from being imported by the Commonwealth Customs (Prohibited Imports) Regulations 1956, including the Dogo Argentino, the Japanese Tosa, the Fila Brasileiro, the Perro de Presa Canario (or Presa Canario) and the American Pit Bull Terrier (or Pit Bull Terrier). Of these, the Pit Bull Terrier and the Perro de Presa Canario are the only breeds currently known to exist in Australia.
Restrictions on these breeds include:
a permit is required for a person to have more than two of a restricted breed; escape-proof and child-proof enclosures; permanent identification using microchip technology; owners must notify their council if the dog escapes, dies or there is a change of ownership; in the case of a change of ownership, owners must advise prospective owners that the dog is a restricted breed; dogs must be leashed and muzzled when in public places; conspicuous "Beware: Restricted Dog" signs must be displayed on property access points; and minors are not to own a restricted breed or be in charge of a restricted breed in public places.
Under the new legislation these restrictions also apply to pit bull crosses and any such dog not registered and desexed by September 29, 2011 can be seized and destroyed.
Western Australia
March 2006
The following dog breeds are restricted:
Dogo Argentino (Argentinean mastiff), Fila Brasileiro (Brazilian mastiff), Japanese Tosa, American Pit Bull Terrier and Pit Bull Terrier breeds, Perro de Presa Canario or Presa Canario and any dog of a mixed breed that visibly contains any of these breeds.
All restricted breed dogs must be muzzled, leashed and controlled by an adult who is physically capable of handling the dog, in any environment except prescribed enclosures.
Restricted breed dogs are also required to be sterilised unless there are extenuating circumstances relating to the animal's physical condition or medical treatment. Owners of these breeds are required to display of warning signs where these dogs are kept, meet stringent fencing requirements, notify the local government of changes in the dogs status (moved, died, etc..), and ensure their dogs wear dangerous dog collars.
Corporal punishment by Australian parents under the law
In relation to corporal punishment by parents, it remains lawful for parents in all jurisdictions to use reasonable corporal punishment to discipline their children. New South Wales is the only state to have made legislative amendments concerning corporal punishment by parents. In 2001, New South Wales introduced the Crimes Amendment (Child Protection Physical Mistreatment) Act. The Act states that physical punishment should not harm a child 'more than briefly' and specifies the parts of a child's body that can be subject to force. While the New South Wales amendment sought to constrain parental use of corporal punishment, it does not ban the use of corporal punishment altogether.
In some jurisdictions a parent's right to use corporal punishment is provided for in legislation, for example New South Wales, while in others it is provided for by the common law ("judge-made law") for example Victoria. All Australian states and territories condone (in principle) the use of force by a parent, by way of correction, towards a child.