Video Information


Below: On August 19, 2016, a protest video was released explaining the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission proposal for a storage facility for nuclear waste from overseas. The video presents a series of arguments against the proposal.





Below: On October 1, 2014, the International Atomic Energy Agency released an information video explaining how different countries currently dispose of their nuclear waste.





Below: On June 1, 2014, D News produced an information segment explaining the problems associated with storing nuclear waste product and current attempts to deal with them.





Below: On December 1, 2016, UN News televised a report on current attempts to deal with nuclear waste safely.





Below: On February 24, 2014, RT America televised a news report of a radiation leak which had occurred in the underground nuclear waste storage facility in New Mexico.





Below: On July 31, 2014, WhatTheWhy released a video explaining the advantages of nuclear energy and showing how its waste products are currently dealt with.





Below: On March 2, 2012, Green TV televised a report on nuclear contamination near nuclear storage facilities in the Champagne and Normandy regions.





Below: On September 11, 2007, a short documentary was posted showing footage of atomic weapons testing at Maralinga in 1953 and then interviews with two men who witnessed or were part of the tests.







Web links, documents

On November 18, 2016, The Adelaide Advertiser published a comment by South Australian premier, Jay Weatherill, in which he put his position on the nuclear waste storage facility being considered for his state.
The full text of this article can be accessed at http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/opinion/jay-weatherill-south-australia-could-reap-financial-and-economic-gains-from-a-nuclear-waste-dump/news-story/fe9c7bf9001d1d8cac32c0da4c951424

On November 17, 2016, the Liberal leader of the South Australian Opposition, Steven Marshall, issued a media release in which he criticised the premier, jay Weatherill, for his decision to hold a referendum on whether the state should establish a nuclear waste storage facility. The release is titled 'Weatherill's nuclear money pit'.
The full text of the media release can be accessed at http://www.stevenmarshall.com.au/weatherill_s_nuclear_money_pit

On November 16, 2016, In Daily published a news report titled 'Politics will destroy SA: Former Lib senator nukes Marshall's dump rejection'
The report details the objections of former South Australian liberal senator, Sean Richards, to South Australian Opposition leader, Steven Marshall's rejection of the nuclear waste storage proposal.
The full text can be accessed at http://indaily.com.au/news/politics/2016/11/16/politics-will-destroy-sa-former-lib-senator-nukes-marshalls-dump-rejection/

On November 15, 2016, The Adelaide Advertiser published a comment and analysis titled 'Premier Jay Weatherill effectively buries nuclear waste dump proposal with vague promise of statewide referendum'
The piece gives a range of negative opinions on the proposed referendum and speculates about the premier's possible motives.
The full text can be accessed at http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/premier-jay-weatherill-will-hold-referendum-on-potential-nuclear-waste-industry-in-south-australia/news-story/c5ee0bcf003c0a5000867674c5b03236

On November 14, 2016, the South Australian premier, Jay Weatherill, issued a media release announcing that there would be a referendum to determine whether the state would proceed with a nuclear waste storage facility.
The full text of this media release can be accessed at http://www.premier.sa.gov.au/index.php/jay-weatherill-news-releases/1411-premier-outlines-path-forward-for-nuclear-discussion

On November 14, 2016, the ABC published a timeline detailing the history of South Australia's involvement on the nuclear waste storage debate. Proposals go back to February, 1998.
The full text can be accessed at http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-09-22/a-timeline-of-south-australias-nuclear-dump-debate/6794606?pfmredir=sm

In November, 2016, the South Australian Government released its response to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission. One element of the response was the announcement that it would conduct a referendum on the question of whether South Australia should establish a nuclear waste storage facility.
The full text can be accessed at http://assets.yoursay.sa.gov.au/production/2016/11/15/04/14/54/d66e8e3d-fadf-4c6e-a5c4-e793f60abe1e/Government%20Response%20-%20NFCRC.pdf

On November 11, 2016, In Daily published a news report titled 'DUMPED: Nuclear repository "dead" as Marshall draws election battleline'
The article details the response of the South Australian leader of the Opposition, Steven Marshall, to the second citizens' jury's rejection of the nuclear waste facility proposal.
The full text can be accessed at http://indaily.com.au/news/local/2016/11/11/dumped-nuclear-repository-dead-as-marshall-draws-election-battleline/

In November, 2016, the results of the state-wide consultative process conducted via meetings across South Australia were published. The Government has interpreted the feedback from this consultation process as not giving it sufficiently clear direction to enable it to make a decision.
The full text of this report can be accessed at http://assets.yoursay.sa.gov.au/production/2016/11/11/09/37/34/0c1d5954-9f04-4e50-9d95-ca3bfb7d1227/NFCRC%20CARA%20Community%20Views%20Report.pdf

On November 10, 2016, the report of the second Nuclear Citizens' Jury to the South Australian government was released to the public.
The jury decided two to one against pursuing a nuclear waste storage facility in South Australia 'under any circumstances'.
The full text of the report can be accessed at http://assets.yoursay.sa.gov.au/production/2016/11/06/07/20/56/26b5d85c-5e33-48a9-8eea-4c860386024f/final%20jury%20report.pdf

On November 8, 2016, ABC News published a detailed analysis of the proposed operation of the nuclear waste storage facilities being debated in South Australia and of the economic modelling on which the financial estimates were based.
This analysis, which includes significant comment, is titled 'SA nuclear waste dump plans based on questionable assumptions and lacks public support'
It was written by Stephen Long. It can be accessed at http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-08/should-south-australia-be-storing-nuclear-waste-above-ground/8003156

In October, 2016, a range of Indigenous spokespeople and representative groups forwarded a submission to the Second Nuclear Citizens' Jury. The submissions included copies of earlier submissions which had been sent to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission and which the senders considered had been disregarded.
All submissions are opposed to the establishment of a nuclear waste storage facility in South Australia.
The full text can be accessed at http://www.anfa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Traditional-Owner-statements-SA-dump-Oct2016.pdf

On July 28, 2016, The Adelaide Advertiser published two comments, one for and one against the establishment of a nuclear waste storage facility in South Australia.
David Valente wrote a piece titled 'Play it safe to protect the world' in which he argues that building a nuclear waste storage facility in South Australia is globally environmentally responsible.
Michael McGuire wrote a comment titled 'It's a sure sign that we've given up' arguing that being prepared to build a nuclear waste storage facility was an indication that South Australia lacked political or economic imagination.
The full text of these points of view can be accessed at http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/should-south-australia-be-home-to-the-worlds-largest-nuclear-waste-dump/news-story/ccec2d6e730d74744590f78acfa77d4f

On July 10, 2016, the report of the first Nuclear Citizens' Jury to the South Australian government was released to the public.
The report highlighted a range of questions raised by the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission that require further investigation.
A slightly abbreviated version of its findings can be accessed at http://assets.yoursay.sa.gov.au/production/2016/07/12/10/28/13/df622a91-cdbb-486d-bbed-20796a4109d5/Nuclear%20Citizens'%20Jury%20FINAL%20Book.pdf

On May 16, 2016, the Beyond Nuclear Initiative issued a media release titled 'SA groups launch No Dump Alliance in response to nuclear Royal Commission findings'
The media release announces the formation of a pressure group, the 'No Dump Alliance', composed of Traditional Owners and representatives from health, union, faith, and conservation groups, and other prominent South Australians. The group aims to prevent the establishment of the nuclear waste storage facility proposed by the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission.
The Beyond Nuclear Initiative (BNI) is a lobby group which aims to highlight the adverse impact of the uranium and wider nuclear industry in Australia and promote a nuclear-free future. BNI is a joint project of Arid Lands Environment Centre, Australian Conservation Foundation and Friends of the Earth Australia.
Together with the media release are a range of comments from experts opposed to the nuclear waste storage facility.
The full text of these documents can be accessed at http://beyondnuclearinitiative.com/sa-royal-commission/

After the Nuclear fuel Cycle Royal Commission's report was released the government established the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission Consultation and Response Agency (CARA).
The purpose of this agency is to facilitate community consultation, education and decision-making around the issue of establishing a nuclear waste storage facility in South Australia.
Information about CARA can be accessed at http://nuclear.yoursay.sa.gov.au/consultation-and-response-agency

On May 10, 2016, the South Australian premier, Jay Weatherill, issued a media release explaining the community consultation process that would put in place around whether a nuclear waste storage facility would be established in South Australia.
The full text of this release can be accessed at http://www.premier.sa.gov.au/index.php/jay-weatherill-news-releases/503-community-views-critical-to-our-state-s-nuclear-future

On May 9, 2016, the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission released its report. The report makes 12 recommendations, the eleventh of which is 'pursue the opportunity to establish used nuclear fuel and intermediate level waste storage and disposal facilities in South Australia'
The full text of the report can be accessed at http://yoursay.sa.gov.au/system/NFCRC_Final_Report_Web.pdf

On April 14, 2016, Green Left Weekly published an opinion piece by Renfrey Clarke titled 'Nuclear waste dump in South Australia: what could possibly go wrong?'
The comment supplies details of a number of accidents that have occurred at nuclear waste storage facilities overseas.
The full text can be accessed at https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/nuclear-waste-dump-south-australia-what-could-possibly-go-wrong

On February 24, 2016, The Eyre Peninsula Tribune published a news report titled 'Nuclear waste debate draws community to speak up'
The report details community opposition to a federal government plan to locate a low-level nuclear waste storage facility on the Eyre Peninsula.
The full text can be accessed at http://www.eyretribune.com.au/story/3749348/community-voices-in-nuclear-waste-debate/

On February 19, 2016, the ABC's current affairs program, The Drum, published a comment by Mike Steketee titled, 'Nuclear winner: The case for South Australia storing nuclear waste'.
Steketee argues that South Australia has a moral and environmental obligation to create a nuclear waste storage facility.
The full text of this argument can be accessed at http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-19/steketee-nuclear-winner:-the-case-for-storing-nuclear-waste/7184650

Updated in February, 2016, the World Nuclear Association's information and persuasion piece titled 'Radioactive Wastes - Myths and Realities'.
The World Nuclear Association is a group which supplies information supporting nuclear power in order to promote its acceptance and use.
The text referred to above can be accessed at http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-wastes/radioactive-wastes-myths-and-realities.aspx

The World Nuclear Association's home page can be accessed at http://www.world-nuclear.org/

On November 5, 2014, the South Australian government issued a media release titled 'Land returned to Maralinga Tjarutja people after 60 years'
The report details the return to the traditional owners of some of the land contaminated by the Maralinga nuclear testing in the 1950s and '60s.
The full text can be accessed at http://www.statedevelopment.sa.gov.au/news-releases/all-news-updates/land-returned-to-maralinga-tjarutja-people-after-60-years

On January 20, 2013, Indymedia published a report titled '200 Aboriginal Maralinga victims denied compensation'. The report details the failure of a compensation claim but by some of those who claim to have been adversely affected by the nuclear testing that occurred in the 1950s and '60s.
The full text of the report can be accessed at http://indymedia.org.au/2013/01/20/200-aboriginal-maralinga-victims-denied-compensation.html

On April 19, 1999, the ABC's current affairs program Four Corners televised a exposé titled 'Critical Mass' detailing attempts to establish a storage facility for high level nuclear waste in Australia.
A full video version of this program can be accessed at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykRb0Iibckk
A full transcript of this program can be accessed at http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/s23893.htm